The Science of Smoking: TAG Founder Brian Handschuh Breaks Down Fluid Dynamics, Thermal Properties, and the Engineering Behind Better Glass

In an industry where marketing hype often outpaces actual innovation, Thick Ass Glass (TAG) has established itself as a brand that puts substance before style. Since 2013, TAG has been producing some of the most durable, functionally superior glass smoking accessories on the market—not by following trends, but by applying serious engineering principles to an often overlooked craft. I recently sat down with Brian Handschuh, TAG’s founder, to get into the nitty-gritty of glass production techniques, the fluid dynamics of percolation, proper water levels, the unexpected utility of diffuser beads, and why downstem design might be the most overlooked component in creating the perfect smoking experience.

---

Kyle: Brian, thanks for taking the time to chat today. I’d like to dive a bit deeper into the technical side of things than most interviews do. Let’s start with the actual glass production process. Can you walk us through how borosilicate differs from standard glass, and why that matters for smoking accessories?

Brian: Happy to get into the technical details, Kyle. Most people don’t realize there’s serious materials science behind quality glass.

Borosilicate glass contains boron trioxide, which gives it a significantly lower coefficient of thermal expansion than standard soda-lime glass. In practical terms, this means it expands and contracts less when exposed to temperature changes. For smoking accessories, where you’re repeatedly heating one area while another remains cool, this property is crucial for preventing stress fractures.

The composition also affects working properties during production. Borosilicate has a higher melting point (around 1650°C versus 1400°C for soda-lime) and a narrower working temperature range. This makes it more challenging to form, which is why many manufacturers avoid it or use lower-quality formulations. But this difficulty is exactly what creates its advantages—it’s harder to work with precisely because it’s more stable and durable.

During production, we use specialized lathes that maintain consistent rotation speeds while glass is heated to working temperature. This ensures even wall thickness, which is critical for structural integrity. The glass must be kept turning continuously during formation of the water chamber, neck, and mouthpiece to prevent asymmetry that could create weak points.

After forming, proper annealing is perhaps the most crucial step that many manufacturers rush or skip entirely. Annealing requires slowly cooling the glass through its strain point (approximately 515°C for borosilicate) at a controlled rate. This relieves internal stresses that would otherwise create microscopic fault lines. Our annealing process for thicker pieces can take up to 24 hours—significantly longer than industry standard, but essential for long-term durability.

When properly executed, borosilicate production creates glass that can withstand not just the thermal stress of regular use, but also the occasional accidental impact that would shatter standard glass. It’s not just marketing jargon—it’s a fundamentally different material with properties specifically suited to the demands of smoking accessories.

Kyle: That’s fascinating. You mentioned wall thickness, which is obviously central to your brand identity. But is there a point of diminishing returns? Can glass be too thick?

Brian: That’s a great question that gets at the engineering balance we’re constantly fine-tuning. There absolutely is a point of diminishing returns, and simply making everything as thick as possible isn’t the goal.

The optimal thickness varies by specific component and its function. For bases, we’ve found that 12-18mm provides exceptional impact resistance without making the piece unwieldy. Going thicker than 16mm adds significant weight and material cost without proportional durability benefits. It also extends annealing time exponentially, which affects production efficiency.

For tube walls, 7-9mm is typically the maximum thickness available, as it’s the thickest tubing provided by raw materials manufacturers. This range offers a solid balance of durability and manageable weight. However, pushing beyond this can cause issues—thicker glass reduces airflow by narrowing the pathway, which can compromise function. 

For example, in components like a beaker’s removable downstem, anything over 2.5mm starts to choke airflow, making it less effective. Similarly, with diffusers, overly thick glass limits slit density, as it becomes nearly impossible to craft high-density slits, further hindering performance. Thicker isn’t always better; it can also make the piece top-heavy, trickier to handle, and more likely to tip over, which could actually increase the risk of breaking.

Joints are a different consideration altogether. These connection points experience both mechanical stress (from insertion/removal of components) and thermal stress (from heat transfer). We use extra thickness here—typically 4-7mm for joint walls compared to the industry standard of 2-3.512mm. The thicker joint provides better heat dissipation and resistance to cracking, but going too thick would make the joint overly rigid and potentially more vulnerable to stress fractures.

Another factor is thermal conductivity. While thicker glass provides better insulation, it also retains heat longer. For components that contact flame directly, this can actually be disadvantageous. That’s why we engineer thickness strategically rather than uniformly.

Perhaps most importantly, excessive thickness can impair function. Percolators with walls that are too thick would restrict internal space, reducing water capacity and bubble formation. Downstems that are too thick would limit airflow. We’re constantly balancing durability against functional requirements for each component.

So yes, glass can absolutely be too thick, which is why we don’t just make everything as thick as possible. Instead, we engineer specific thickness profiles for each component based on its functional requirements and stress exposure.

Kyle: Let’s talk fluid dynamics. Most people don’t think about the science behind percolation, but it seems central to how these products actually function. Can you break down the physics of what’s happening when smoke passes through water?

Brian: Fluid dynamics is probably the most overlooked aspect of glass design, yet it’s fundamental to the smoking experience. What’s happening during percolation is actually a complex interaction of gas diffusion, bubble formation, and heat transfer.

When smoke enters water, we’re creating a two-phase flow system—gas moving through liquid. The basic principle is increasing surface area contact between smoke and water to facilitate cooling and filtration. This is where bubble size becomes critical.

Smaller bubbles have a higher surface area-to-volume ratio, which means more of the smoke contacts water, leading to better cooling and filtration. However, creating smaller bubbles requires more pressure differential (or “pull” from the user), which creates drag. It’s a classic engineering trade-off.

The architecture of the percolator directly influences bubble formation. Take our super slit puck percolators—they feature more slits than industry standard, typically 20-25 slits versus the 8-12 found in many competitors. Each slit is precisely sized (typically 1.0-1.4mm) to create optimal bubble dimension without excessive restriction.

The angle and position of these slits also matters. Horizontal slits create different bubble patterns than vertical ones. Slits positioned lower in the water column provide more contact time but require more draw effort. This is why we position slits at specific heights based on intended water levels and desired function.

Temperature also plays a significant role in this dynamic. Warmer water has lower surface tension, which actually facilitates smaller bubble formation but provides less cooling. Cold water offers better cooling but can create larger bubbles due to increased surface tension. This is why some experienced users slightly warm their water for better diffusion while others prefer ice-cold water for maximum cooling.

The chamber shape around the percolator influences bubble coalescence—how quickly smaller bubbles combine into larger ones. A wider chamber allows bubbles to spread out, reducing coalescence and maintaining smaller bubble size longer. This is why beakers often provide slightly better diffusion despite simpler percolators; the wider water chamber allows better bubble distribution.

What many don’t realize is that different smoke compositions interact differently with water. Denser smoke from combustion benefits from more extensive percolation, while the lighter vapor from concentrates is better preserved with less aggressive diffusion. This is why we engineer different percolation systems for flower pieces versus dab rigs.

You might assume that stacking bubbles in glass bongs—where bubbles pile up in the chamber—would enhance cooling due to prolonged water exposure. However, the opposite is often true. Effective stacking, while visually striking, typically means smaller, tighter bubbles with less surrounding water volume or mass. This reduces the water’s capacity to absorb and dissipate heat, leading to less cooling overall. 

Stacking is more a sign of balanced airflow and thoughtful percolation design than a gimmick. When smoke stacks well, it’s making optimal contact with the water without excessive turbulence, but the cooling power hinges on water volume, not just bubble formation.

Kyle: Water level seems to be another crucial but often misunderstood factor in getting the best performance. How important is proper water fill, and what guidelines do you recommend?

Brian: Water level in a bong or rig ultimately comes down to personal preference, but it’s a make-or-break factor for function—and one of the most frequently misjudged elements of use. The ideal level strikes a balance between diffusion, drag, and splash protection, tailored to the piece’s design and the user’s priorities. 

Some opt for the highest water level possible, maximizing bubble production and cooling, even if it means heavier drag and sacrificing airflow. Others prioritize minimal splashback—keeping water just above the perc for smoother hits without the mess—while accepting less diffusion. There’s no universal ‘perfect’ level; it hinges on how you weigh those trade-offs and what feels right for your session.

The first principle is covering your percolation source completely. For a basic downstem, this means submerging the slits by about 1/2 to 3/4 inch. For more complex percolators, each specific design has an optimal range. Honeycomb percs typically need about 1/2 inch above the disc, while tree percs should have their slits submerged.

Too little water means inadequate diffusion—smoke passes through without proper bubble formation, resulting in hotter, harsher hits. Too much water creates excessive drag, making the piece harder to pull while increasing the risk of water splashing into your mouth.

For multi-perc setups, the water level relationship between chambers becomes even more important. The water displacement from one percolator affects the function of others. We typically recommend starting with the minimum effective water level in each perc and then adjusting based on personal preference.

A good rule of thumb for most beakers is filling to about 1-1.5 inches above where the downstem meets the water. For straight tubes, about 1 inch above the percolator is typically ideal. The perfect recycler setup lets you rip as hard as you can without a drop of splashback. Water fills the funnel just enough to cycle smoothly under any draw, even a full-force inhale, while staying clear of your lips. It’s the gold standard: maximum function, zero mess, no matter how you hit it.

Temperature also affects optimal water level because it changes how smoke diffuses. Colder water typically performs better with slightly lower levels due to increased density and surface tension.

One tip we often share: when in doubt, start with less water and gradually add more while testing the function between additions. It’s easier to add more water than to remove excess, especially with complex percs that can be difficult to drain precisely.

For those who really want to dial in performance, we recommend testing different levels while paying attention to bubble size, draw resistance, and cooling effect. The perfect level is the one that creates the smallest bubbles with the least resistance while keeping water away from the mouthpiece.

Many of our designs include subtle markers—rings or notches—that indicate optimal water levels for different use cases. It’s a small detail, but it makes a significant difference in helping users get the best performance from their piece.

Kyle: Let’s talk about a relatively obscure topic: diffuser beads. Some enthusiasts swear by them, others consider them gimmicky. What’s your take on their functionality?

Brian: Diffuser beads are one of those accessories that actually have legitimate functional benefits, though they’re often misunderstood or incorrectly used. At their core, they’re simple—usually glass, ceramic, or sometimes silicon carbide marbles that sit in the water chamber. But their effect on fluid dynamics is quite interesting.

What diffuser beads do is disrupt laminar flow patterns in the water. When smoke bubbles rise through water, they tend to follow consistent paths based on the percolator design. By introducing physical obstacles, the beads force these bubbles to take more chaotic, unpredictable paths, which increases their travel distance and water contact time.

The beads also create nucleation sites—points where bubbles form more readily. This can actually improve diffusion by breaking larger bubbles into smaller ones as they navigate around the beads. Smaller bubbles mean more surface area contact with water, which enhances both cooling and filtration.

Another benefit is thermal regulation. The beads absorb and distribute heat, helping maintain more consistent water temperature during extended sessions. Since water temperature affects surface tension and diffusion dynamics, this consistency improves overall function.

Where diffuser beads really shine is in simpler pieces with basic downstems. They can significantly improve the performance of a straight downstem by creating secondary diffusion after the initial bubble formation. In more complex percolators, the benefits are less pronounced since the perc itself is already creating optimal diffusion.

The trick to using them effectively is proper quantity and placement. Too few beads won’t create significant flow disruption, while too many can restrict water movement and create excessive drag. We typically recommend filling no more than 15-20% of the water chamber volume with beads.

Also, bead material matters. Borosilicate glass beads offer the best combination of thermal properties and inertness, ensuring they don’t affect flavor. Ceramic beads can slightly alter taste due to their porous nature, while silicon carbide offers excellent heat distribution but is less commonly used due to cost.

For everyday users, I’d say diffuser beads are a worthwhile, low-cost upgrade for simpler pieces, providing tangible improvements in cooling and smoothness. For pieces with advanced percolation systems, they’re less necessary but can still offer marginal benefits, particularly for cooling.

Kyle: Downstems seem like a relatively basic component, but you’ve mentioned their importance several times. What makes a quality downstem, and how much difference can it really make?

Brian: Downstems are probably the most underrated component in the entire system. Many people view them as simple tubes, but a well-engineered downstem can transform the performance of even basic pieces. It’s where smoke first contacts water, setting the foundation for the entire diffusion process.

The four critical elements of downstem design are length, diameter, slit configuration, and angle of entry.

Length is straightforward but crucial—the downstem needs to reach the proper depth in water without touching the bottom of the base (which would restrict airflow and risk breakage). For beakers, the ideal downstem typically extends to about 0.25-0.50 inches from the bottom. Too short, and you get inadequate water contact; too long, and you create unnecessary drag.

Diameter’s impact on airflow gets real specific with downstem sizes: 28mm downstems pack a 15mm ID, 18mm ones offer 10mm ID, and 14mm ones drop to 8mm ID or less. Bigger IDs—like that 15mm—shine because they maximize flow, letting the slits dictate drag instead of the pathway itself. With a diffuser, you want resistance dialed in at the slits—where bubble size and feel are shaped—not choked by a narrow tube. If the flow pathway’s the bottleneck, you’re stuck with a hard limit on function, no matter how well the slits perform. High ID keeps the air moving freely, putting control where it belongs.

Slit configuration is the heart of a diffuser’s performance. If slits are too large, you get a handful of big, lazy bubbles—inefficient diffusion that wastes water contact. The goal is a higher slit count—think 15-20 precision-cut slits, not the skimpy 5-8 of basic downstems—sized and spaced so most activate during a normal, slow draw for optimal bubble distribution, while the rest kick in on the clear. When you clear, that faster, harder inhale demands higher airflow without restriction, so a well-engineered diffuser adapts seamlessly. 

Ideal slit width lands at 1.0-1.4mm—small enough to churn out fine bubbles for solid diffusion, big enough to stack consistently without choking the flow. Too small, and you’re fighting resistance; too big, and you lose efficiency. A great diffuser handles both the mellow draw and the quick rip with minimal drag, keeping the experience smooth from start to finish.

The angle of downstem entry significantly impacts bubble travel path and water movement. A 45-degree entry angle (common in most beakers) creates a circular water motion that helps prevent splash-back while maximizing bubble travel distance. More vertical angles create more direct paths, which can be beneficial for certain percolator designs but less optimal for basic diffusion.

Material thickness also matters. A downstem with walls that are too thin becomes fragile at the slits, while one that’s too thick restricts internal diameter and flow. We use 2-3mm thick borosilicate for downstems, providing durability without compromising function.

The performance difference between a basic open-ended downstem and a properly engineered diffused downstem is remarkable—typically a 30-40% improvement in cooling and smoothness by our testing. It’s one of the most cost-effective upgrades for any water pipe, replacing a basic downstem with a high-quality diffused one often transforms the experience completely.

For those looking to maximize performance without investing in complex multi-perc setups, focusing on downstem quality offers the best return on investment. A simple beaker with a premium diffused downstem will outperform many more elaborate pieces with basic downstems.

Kyle: The consumer landscape for glass has changed dramatically with the internet. How has online customer education impacted what people look for in quality glass?

Brian: The internet has completely transformed how consumers evaluate and purchase glass. 15 years ago, most people made decisions based primarily on in-person shopping experiences, limited by what local shops carried and the knowledge of whoever happened to be working that day. Information asymmetry was the norm—manufacturers and retailers knew far more about quality indicators than consumers.

Today’s landscape couldn’t be more different. Forums like Reddit have created spaces where enthusiasts share detailed experiences, comparisons, and even technical analyses of different products. Customers now come to us with surprisingly sophisticated understanding of joint tolerances, percolation physics, and glass composition.

This democratization of knowledge has shifted the market in several important ways. First, it’s created demand for specific technical information rather than vague quality claims. When we launched TAG, listing specific glass thickness measurements was uncommon. Now it’s expected, along with details on percolator design, joint reinforcement, and other engineering specifications.

Second, it’s elevated function over aesthetics for many buyers. While visually impressive pieces still have their place, we’re seeing more customers who specifically seek out designs optimized for performance rather than just appearance. They’re asking about airflow paths, bubble formation patterns, and cleaning accessibility rather than just how a piece looks on a shelf.

Third, it’s created a much more transparency-driven marketplace. False or exaggerated claims get quickly debunked in online communities. When a company claims their glass is “thick” or “high-quality,” users can easily share side-by-side comparisons that confirm or refute those assertions. This has been tremendously beneficial for companies like ours that have always focused on engineering substance over marketing style.

The rise of video content has been particularly important. Customers can now see pieces in action before purchasing, watching bubble patterns, smoke stacking, and clearance speeds. This functional demonstration has become more valuable than static product photography for many buyers.

What’s most interesting about this shift is how it’s created a more educated “middle market.” In the past, there was a huge knowledge gap between casual users and serious enthusiasts. Now we’re seeing a large segment of moderately engaged consumers who understand the basics of quality engineering and make purchasing decisions accordingly.

For TAG, this educated consumer base has been ideal. We’ve always engineered our pieces with function as the primary consideration, so having customers who can appreciate those engineering details has allowed us to focus on substance rather than hype.

Kyle: Let’s talk about a common pain point: cleaning and maintenance. Are there design elements that make pieces easier or harder to clean, and what techniques do you recommend?

Brian: Cleaning is one of those practical considerations that significantly impacts the long-term satisfaction with any piece, yet it’s often overlooked in the purchasing decision. There are definitely design elements that make a huge difference in maintenance difficulty.

From a design perspective, several factors influence cleanability:

Chamber geometry is crucial—pieces with sharp corners or inaccessible recesses trap residue that’s difficult to remove. We design our chambers with gradually curved transitions rather than abrupt angles wherever possible, allowing cleaning solutions to reach all surfaces.

Percolator accessibility varies dramatically. Tree percs, while visually impressive and functionally excellent, can be challenging to clean thoroughly because residue builds up in the narrow arms. Honeycomb and matrix percs, despite their many holes, are often easier to maintain because they present flat surfaces accessible from multiple angles.

Joint design affects cleaning significantly. Ground joints that are properly sized and finished don’t trap residue in microscopic crevices the way poorly finished joints do. We precision-grind our joints to specific tolerances that create proper seals without creating residue traps.

Internal diameter consistency matters throughout the piece. Sudden narrowing creates areas where residue accumulates and cleaning solutions can’t reach effectively. We maintain consistent internal diameters through transitions wherever function allows.

For cleaning techniques, I recommend a regular maintenance routine rather than waiting until a piece is heavily soiled:

For daily maintenance, a hot water rinse immediately after use prevents residue from hardening and becoming difficult to remove. Simply running hot (not boiling) water through the piece for 30 seconds can prevent 70-80% of buildup.

For weekly cleaning, isopropyl alcohol (91%+ concentration) combined with coarse salt is remarkably effective. The alcohol dissolves residues while the salt acts as a physical scrubbing agent. Fill the piece, cover the openings, shake vigorously for 1-2 minutes, then rinse thoroughly.

For stubborn buildup, soaking is key. Allow the piece to sit completely submerged in cleaning solution for 6-12 hours, then rinse. For particularly difficult residue, warming (not heating) the cleaning solution can increase its effectiveness.

For precision cleaning in hard-to-reach areas, specialized tools make a significant difference. Pipe cleaners, bottle brushes, and even dental tools can be useful for removing residue from percolators and tight spaces.

After any cleaning, especially with solvents, rinse multiple times with warm water to ensure all cleaning agents are removed before your next use.

One often-overlooked aspect of cleaning is prevention. Using filtered water in your piece reduces mineral buildup, while changing water frequently prevents organic growth. Some users add a drop of cranberry extract or lemon juice to their water, which creates an acidic environment that helps prevent residue adhesion.

The ultimate test of good design is how a piece performs after months or years of regular use and cleaning. A well-engineered piece should function nearly as well after 500 sessions as it did on day one, assuming proper maintenance.

Kyle: For someone looking to make a significant investment in quality glass, what are the most important features to prioritize, and which ones might be more marketing hype than actual functional benefit?

Brian: When making a significant investment in quality glass, focusing on the right features ensures you’re paying for performance rather than marketing gimmicks. Here’s what actually matters versus what’s often just hype:

The most important features to prioritize are:

1. Glass thickness at stress points – Bases should be 9mm+ (ideally 12-16mm), and walls should be 5mm+ (ideally 7-9mm). This isn’t just about drop protection; thicker glass maintains structural integrity during temperature changes and daily use. Joint areas should be reinforced as these are common failure points.
   
2. Joint quality and thickness – The joint connection is critical for both function and durability. Look for joints with walls at least 5mm thick, with smooth, precision ground finishes that create proper seals. The joint should have a reinforced connection to the main chamber, not just a thin attachment point.
   
3. Basic airflow engineering – The path smoke takes through the piece should be logical and unobstructed. Look for smooth transitions between chambers, appropriately sized tubes (typically 1.5-2″ diameter for main chambers), and diffusion sources positioned for optimal bubble distribution.
   
4. Material quality – True borosilicate glass is essential for thermal resistance and durability. Properly annealed glass shows no visible stress patterns when viewed through polarized light. This isn’t easily verified without specialized equipment, so reputation and production standards matter here.
   
5. Percolator functionality over complexity – A well-designed single perc often outperforms multiple poorly engineered percs. Look for slit or hole patterns that create consistent, small bubbles without excessive restriction. Functionality should always trump visual complexity.
   

Features that tend to be more marketing hype include:

1. Excessive percolator count – More percs don’t automatically mean better filtration. Multiple percs often create unnecessary drag and diminishing returns on actual cooling. Three well-designed percs is typically the maximum before performance suffers.
   
2. Overly complex recycler paths – While recyclers serve a functional purpose, some designs add numerous chambers and tubes that look impressive but actually impair proper water circulation. Effective recyclers need balanced intake and drain paths, not just complex aesthetics.
   
3. Random color accents or decorative elements – While aesthetics certainly matter, color work that doesn’t serve a functional purpose (like highlighting water levels or reinforcing stress points) is purely cosmetic and shouldn’t command significant price premiums.
   
4. “Proprietary” percolation designs – Many brands claim unique percolation technology, but the physics of bubble formation and water filtration are universal. What matters is execution quality, not marketing terminology.
   
5. Excessively tall pieces – Height beyond about 18 inches rarely improves function and often creates stability issues. The ideal height balances water capacity, cooling path length, and practical usability.
   

The best investment approach is focusing on engineering fundamentals rather than flash. A well-made 14″ beaker with thick glass, a quality diffused downstem, and proper joint work will provide better long-term satisfaction than a taller, more complex piece with thin glass and poor engineering.

Remember that quality engineering often hides in subtle details—the thickness of a joint connection, the spacing of percolator slits, the angle of a downstem entry. These factors impact daily performance far more than visually impressive but functionally questionable features.

Kyle: To wrap up, what’s your vision for TAG’s future? Are there new materials, technologies, or design approaches you’re excited about?

Brian: Our vision for TAG’s future centers on advancing the science behind smoking accessories while maintaining our core commitment to quality engineering and honest value. We’re pursuing several exciting directions that I believe will define the next evolution of our industry.

On the materials front, we’re exploring hybrid glass compositions that could further enhance durability without compromising clarity or function. Traditional borosilicate remains excellent, but we’re testing formulations with modified silica content that could provide even better thermal properties and impact resistance. We’re also investigating specialized coatings that could make glass more resilient at critical stress points while remaining completely inert.

From a design perspective, we’re developing more sophisticated fluid dynamics modeling capabilities. We’ve recently begun using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to visualize and optimize smoke paths and bubble formation before creating physical prototypes. This approach allows us to test dozens of subtle variations in percolator designs to identify optimal configurations for different functions.

The Made To Order service we launched in 2021 is evolving toward more comprehensive customization options. Beyond just choosing colors and features, we’re working toward a system where customers can participate more directly in the engineering process, selecting specific percolation styles, chamber proportions, and other functional elements based on their preferences.

We’re also investing significantly in educational resources. We’re developing more advanced visualizations of percolation physics, comparative performance data across different designs, and interactive tools that help customers understand exactly what makes one design functionally superior to another. Education has always been part of our approach, but we’re taking it to a much more sophisticated level.

On the manufacturing side, we’re implementing more advanced quality control technologies, including optical scanning systems that can verify glass thickness and detect microscopic stress points that might not be visible to the naked eye. This allows us to maintain even more consistent quality standards across all our products.

Finally, we’re exploring complementary technologies that enhance the smoking experience. While glass remains our core focus, we’re researching how materials science advances in related fields could be applied to create hybrid products that combine the best properties of different materials.

Throughout all these initiatives, our fundamental approach remains unchanged: engineering excellence, honest value, and designs based on actual performance rather than marketing trends. The smoking accessories market continues to mature, with more educated consumers seeking quality over hype, and that evolution aligns perfectly with the principles that have guided TAG from the beginning.

Kyle: Brian, this has been an incredibly detailed and informative conversation. Thank you for sharing your expertise and passion for quality engineering.

Brian: Thanks for the thoughtful questions, Kyle. It’s refreshing to dive into the technical details that really make a difference in both durability and function. At the end of the day, engineering excellence isn’t just about making products that last—it’s about creating experiences that consistently deliver on their promise. That’s what drives everything we do at TAG.

---

Kyle Benson is a technology and product design writer for Best Online, focusing on companies that prioritize engineering excellence and technical innovation in consumer products.